Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Rigosertib - - Recommendations On How And Precisely Why You Could Reap Benefits From This

We explored the outcomes of debulking surgery in the setting of these very high-risk PCa patients, in order to assess its feasibility. This review confirms the important role achieved by surgery in the complex setting of patients with very high-risk PCA. Excellent http://www.selleckchem.com/ survival rates have been reported, even when PSA exceeds 100?ng/mL. The completion of RP with lymphadenectomy might give a survival benefit in patients who were found intraoperatively to be node-positive. Furthermore, salvage RP confirmed to be the most effective treatment option after RT failure. On the contrary, up-to-date surgery of isolated nodal recurrences has shown only little benefit. Finally, there is no evidence supporting the efficacy of debulking surgery in metastatic or in hormone-refractory tumours. An accurate selection of the patient is essential. this website To conduct a critical analysis of the available literature on the feasibility of debulking surgery in the setting of very high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) scenarios. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase using combinations of the following keywords: radical prostatectomy, surgery, high-risk, high PSA (prostate-specific antigen), radiorecurrent, hormone-refractory, metastatic prostate cancer, salvage. Radical prostatectomy (RP) achieved excellent survival rates in high-risk PCa, even in patients with very high PSA level. The completion of RP with lymphadenectomy might give a survival benefit in patients who were found intraoperatively to be node-positive. Debulking surgery achieved an important role in several aggressive PCa scenarios. An accurate selection of the patient is essential. ""Study Type �C Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence?4 To critically analyse the learning Rigosertib curve for one experienced open surgeon converting to robotic surgery for radical prostatectomy (RP). From February 2006 to December 2008, 502 patients had retropubic RP (RRP) while concurrently 212 had robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) by one urologist. We prospectively compared the baseline patient and tumour characteristics, variables during and after RP, histopathological features and early urinary functional outcomes in the two groups. The patients in both groups were similar in age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, and prostatic volume. However, there were more high-stage (T2b and T3, P= 0.02) and -grade (Gleason 9, P= 0.01) tumours in the RRP group. The mean (range) operative duration was 147?(75�C330)?min for RRP and 192?(119�C525)?min for RALP (P < 0.001); 110 cases were required to achieve ��3-h proficiency��. Major complication rates were 1.8% and 0.8% for RALP and RRP, respectively. The overall positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 21.2% in the RALP and 16.
Sign In or Register to comment.